Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 24 April 2013 21:06, Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote:
>> What goal are you trying to accomplish with this patch?
> That we might need to patch the checksum version on a production release.
I don't actually buy that argument, certainly not as something that
could happen in 9.3.
I'm inclined to think we should forget about this until we have a
concrete use-case for it. As Jeff says, there is no need for pg_control
contents to be compatible across major releases, so there's no harm in
waiting if we have any doubts about how it ought to work.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
