On Apr26, 2013, at 10:28 , Ants Aasma <ants.aa...@eesti.ee> wrote: > On Apr 25, 2013 10:38 PM, "Jeff Davis" <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 11:44 +0300, Ants Aasma wrote: > > > I will try to reword. > > > > Did you have a chance to clarify this, as well as some of the other > > documentation issues Simon mentioned here? > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+U5nMKVEu8UDXQe > > +Nk=d7nqm4ypfszaef0esak4j31lyqc...@mail.gmail.com > > Not yet. I am busy at the moment due to events in private life. I might be > able to find some time over the weekend to go over the documentation but no > guarantees.
I can try to write up the reasoning behind the choice of FNV1+SHIFT3 as a checksum function, but I'm quite busy too so I'm not 100% certain I'll get to it. If that's OK with you Ants, that is. > > I'm not sure if others are waiting on me for a new patch or not. I can > > give the documentation issues a try, but I was hesitant to do so because > > you've done the research. > > > > The problems that I can correct are fairly trivial. > > The unresolved code issue that I know of is moving the compiler flags behind > a configure check. I would greatly appreciate it if you could take a look at > that. My config-fu is weak and it would take me some time to figure out how > to do that. Do we necessarily have to do that before beta? If not, let's concentrate on getting the basic path in, and let's add the gcc-specific compiler options later. best regards, Florian Pflug -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
