On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 08:51:23AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 5:08 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > I have to admit I don't see the point. None of those values is particularly > > interesting to anybody without implementation level knowledge and those > > will likely deal with them just fine. And I find the version with the > > shorter names far quicker to read. > > The clarity win here doesn't seem to be worth the price of potentially > > breaking some tools. > > +1.
FYI, pg_upgrade would certainly have to be updated to handle this change. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
