On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 03:03:58PM -0700, Jeff Janes wrote: > > Some suggestions, perhaps just based on my preference for verbosity: > > > > > > <para> > > Add cache of local locks (Jeff Janes) > > </para> > > > > <para> > > This speeds lock release at statement completion in transactions > > that hold many locks; it is particularly useful for pg_dump. > > </para> > > > > > > I think this is equally important for restoration of dumps, if the > restoration > > is run all in one transaction. (Making the dump and restoring it have > similar > > locking and unlocking patterns) > > Do you have proposed wording? I can't say just dump/restore as it only > helps with _logical_ dump and _logical_ restore, and we don't have a > clear word for logical restore, as it could be pg_restore or piped into > psql. We could do: > > that hold many locks; it is particularly useful for pg_dump and > restore. > > but "restore" seems very vague. > Yeah, I wasn't sure about how to work that either. "...and the restore of such dumps."? Cheers, Jeff
