* Dimitri Fontaine (dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr) wrote: > Another advantage of using more the extension infrastructure is that > shipping bug fixes in the C or SQL parts of them would allow a hot fix > to be shipped without restart when limited to an extension.
I'm actually not thrilled with the security update situation when it
comes to extensions. It really is a disservice to our users to ask them
to independently manage each and every extension and upgrade each one of
them by hand.
> In-core installed-by-default extensions, anyone?
I'm not against this idea- but we *still* need to solve the problem of
how we update the catalog during a point release and, imv anyway, we
would need to be able to upgrade any in-core installed-by-default
extensions during a point release too, to address any security or other
issues from them. Right now we get to slide by on upgrading extensions
by not having any in-core / installed-by-default ones and punting to the
user with "well, you installed it, not us, therefore you have to manage
it by hand for eternity"; that doesn't work when we're installing it for
them and they may not even know they've got it..
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
