On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On 5/8/13 11:51 AM, Dave Page wrote: >> This patch seems to have broken the build for our installers for 9.3. >> Because we need a consistent build of the PL interpretors on all the >> platforms we support, we use the ActiveState distributions of Perl, >> Python and TCL (we can't rely on vendor supplied packages, because >> their versions vary between different Linux distros and different OS X >> versions). However, ActivePython doesn't include a shared library, >> which this change seems to require. >> >> Can that requirement be reverted? > > There was no change in this regard. A shared library was always > required on OS X.
It's failing on Linux. Even worse, it configures fine and then builds without error. There is a message spewed out by configure, but it doesn't contain the words warning or error. Given that I explicitly said I wanted Python support when I ran configure, it should certainly fail with an error at configure time. We only noticed this was a problem when the QA guys started diving in to more detailed tested, as we don't watch for every message in the 50+ MB of logs our automated build systems generate. > ActivePython does include a shared library. I just tried it and it > builds fine. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers