On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Stas Kelvich <stanc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> * Don't do cube with type support > Eventually, there is different ways of reducing R-Tree size. For > example we can store relative coordinates with dynamic size of MBR (VRMBR), > instead of absolute coordinates with fixed sized MBR. There is some > evidences, that this can sufficiently reduce size. > http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/11427865_13 Sounds promising. Did you examine how this technique can fit into GiST? In current GiST interface methods don't have access to parent entries. ------ With best regards, Alexander Korotkov.
