On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I unfortunately have to say I don't really see the point of this. The > cost of the additional connection attempt is rather low and we have to > deal with the superflous attempts anyway since there will be old libpqs > around for years. Why is this worth the effort?
I have always considered this a wart, and I think we've had customers complain about these kinds of things, too. So +1 from me for fixing it. If not everyone updates their client to take advantage of the new APIs, so be it. If psql and pgAdmin do, it'll solve 90% of the problem. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
