On 21 May 2013 15:29, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Or, what about using CHECKPOINT_FORCE and just printing "force"? > Currently that checkpoint always starts because of existence of the > end-of-recovery record, but I think we should ensure that the checkpoint > always starts by using that flag.
This would mean we can't use the secondary checkpoint record, but we already gave that up so should be OK. Three people, three suggestions; so I will agree to this suggestion so we can get on with it. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
