On 31 May 2013 08:34, Brendan Jurd <dire...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 31 May 2013 02:52, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Testing 9.3beta, it seems that array_remove() may return an empty 1-d >> array whose upper bound is lower than its lower bound. I know that we >> discussed allowing this kind of array, but I don't think that >> discussion reached any conclusion, other than to agree that the >> current empty 0-d array behaviour would be kept in 9.3. >> > > That's right, zero-D is still the only supported representation of an > empty array, so when array_remove() yields an empty array it ought to > be zero-D. Good catch. >
Yeah, that's what I thought. Here's a patch to fix it, plus a new regression test to confirm that the result is a zero-D array. Regards, Dean
array_remove.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
