On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> wrote: >> OK, simple enough. New patch attached. I still need to do some >> testing to verify this does not break anything, but other than >> that, any complaints (including the notion of backpatching this >> back to 9.1)? > > Here's a cleaned up version, which also includes documentation. I'll > commit back to 9.1 in a day or two unless there are any objections.
Changing SQL syntax in the back-branches isn't normally something we do, but I confess I don't see any real reason not to do it in this case. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
