Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Kevin Grittner <[email protected]> writes:
>>> If we were a little earlier in the release cycle I would argue that >>> if we're going to do anything with this column we should drop it. > >> Which is exactly what I think we should do as soon as we branch. > > If we're going to do that, there doesn't seem to me to be a lot of point > in adjusting the column's contents in 9.3 --- the argument for doing > that was mostly forward compatibility with some future actual usage of > the column. I'd be more inclined to leave HEAD as-is and then do the > column-ectomy along with this removal of dead code in 9.4. ok -- Kevin Grittner EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
