On 7 June 2013 02:32, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Hm, good point. That reinforces my feeling that the page-number-based > approach isn't workable as a guarantee; though we might want to keep > that layout rule as a heuristic that would help reduce contention.
Can the locks just be taken in, say, numeric order of the pages involved? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
