* Merlin Moncure (mmonc...@gmail.com) wrote: > It's understood that posix_fallocate is faster at this -- the question > on the table is 'does this matter in context of postgres?'. > Personally I think this patch should go in regardless -- the concerns > made IMNSHO are specious.
I've not had a chance to look at this patch, but I tend to agree with
Merlin. My main question is really- would this be useful for extending
*relations*? Apologies if it's already been discussed; I do plan to go
back and read the threads about this more fully, but I wanted to voice
my support for using posix_fallocate, when available, in general.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
