On 12 June 2013 23:01, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> writes: >> [ pg_relation_is_updatable.patch ] > > I've committed this with some modifications as mentioned. There is > still room to debate exactly what > information_schema.columns.is_updatable means --- we can now change that > without an initdb. >
Thanks. Those modifications all look pretty neat. I'm inclined to stick with the current definition of what updatable means in the information schema. I'm not entirely convinced that other possible interpretations of the spec are any more valid, and it certainly doesn't seem worth another initdb or a break with backwards compatibility by changing it. At least we now have functions that can give a more intuitive result for updatability. Regards, Dean -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
