> No. I think as long as we only have pglz and one new algorithm (even if > that is lz4 instead of the current snappy) we should just always use the > new algorithm. Unless I missed it nobody seemed to have voiced a > contrary position? > For testing/evaluation the guc seems to be sufficient.
Then it's not "pluggable", is it? It's "upgradable compression support", if anything. Which is fine, but let's not confuse people. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
