On 19 June 2013 10:15, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2013-06-19 10:03:40 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: >> On 19 June 2013 09:19, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI >> <horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> >> > It should useful in other aspects but it seems a bit complicated >> > just to know about visibility bits for certain blocks. >> >> With your current patch you can only see the visibility info for >> blocks in cache, not for all blocks. So while you may think it is >> useful, it is also unnecessarily limited in scope. > > pg_freespace should do more than that? Are you thinking of > pg_buffercache?
I was... my mistake. Please continue Kyotaro. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
