On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Or maybe they really don't give a damn about breaking > applications every time they invent a new reserved word?
I think this is the obvious conclusion. In the standard the reserved words are pretty explicitly reserved and not legal column names, no? I think their model is that applications work with a certain version of SQL and they're not expected to work with a new version without extensive updating. -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
