Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I do not see a good reason why "fatal" and "off" shouldn't be allowed > >> values for all three message variables. If we just did that, then you'd > >> be back to sharable code. > > > I recommended he only allow valid values for each variable. I think if > > we say we only support values X,Y,Z we had better throw an error if it > > anything else. > > That's not what I said: I said allow all the values for each variable. > And document it. Why shouldn't we let people turn off error logging > if they want to?
But the client side doesn't make any sense to support FATAL. Am I missing something? > > Seems a new GUC variable seems like overkill to me, and I think we need > > to allow it to be raised. I think we can make server_min_messages > > PGC_SUSET so only the admin can change it. > > Okay, and log_min_error_statement too. Yes. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
