On 06/24/2013 03:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
We probably do need to preserve attribute numbers across an upgrade,
even for foreign tables. I think those could make their way into
other places.
Hm ... this argument would also apply to composite types; do we get it
right for those?
Yes we do. It's handled at pg_dump.c starting about line 8936.
It looks like we need to add cases of foreign tables to the block that
starts around line 13117.
We should also have a test of this in the core regression tests so that
doing the wrong thing might be caught by regular upgrade testing.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
