On 06/25/2013 11:26 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2013-06-25 11:04:38 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >>> a) not at all >>> b) in a single block titled "Reviewers for this version" at the bottom. >>> c) on the patch they reviewed, for each patch >> >> C. The idea that reviewers are somehow less than authors is rather >> disheartening. > > It's not about the reviewers being less. It's a comparison of > effort. The effort for a casual review simply isn't comparable with the > effort spent on developing a nontrivial patch.
On the other hand, I will point out that we currently have a shortage of reviewers, and we do NOT have a shortage of patch submitters. Seems like we should apply incentives where we need help, no? Mind you, my votes are (B), (A), and (A). -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
