Tom Lane said: > Agreed, separating out the function-call-with-trailing-declaration > syntaxes so they aren't considered in FROM and index_elem seems like > the best compromise. > > If we do that for window function OVER clauses as well, can we make > OVER less reserved?
Yes. At least, I tried it with both OVER and FILTER unreserved and there were no grammar conflicts (and I didn't have to do anything fancy to avoid them), and it passed regression with the exception of the changed error message for window functions in the from-clause. So is this the final decision on how to proceed? It seems good to me, and I can work with David to get it done. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad) -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
