On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:08:03PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > On 05/28/2013 07:55 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > >>Perhaps just documenting the behavior is all that is needed, but -U is > >>everywhere and I think that's a good thing. > > > >[ moved to hacker ] > > > >Wow, I never realized other tools used -U for user, instead of -u. > >Should I change pg_upgrade to use -U for 9.4? I can keep supporting -u > >as an undocumented option. > > Yes, -U makes the most sense as that is what is used with the other > tools. I think you should just drop -u, this isn't something people > are doing everyday (like psql). The backward compatibility argument > is pretty slim.
Done for 9.4. I also simplified some of the option values in --help and the docs. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
