On Friday, June 28, 2013 6:38 PM Robert Haas wrote: On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kap...@huawei.com> wrote: >>> Currently it wakes up based on bgwriterdelay config parameter which is by >>> default 200ms, so you means we should >>> think of waking up bgwriter based on allocations and number of elements left >>> in freelist? > >> I think that's what Andres and I are proposing, yes.
> Incidentally, I'm going to mark this patch Returned with Feedback in >the CF application. Many thanks to you and Andres for providing valuable suggestions. >I think this line of inquiry has potential, but >clearly there's a lot more work to do here before we commit anything, >and I don't think that's going to happen in the next few weeks. But >let's keep discussing. Sure. With Regards, Amit Kapila. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
