On 30 June 2013 02:33, Amit kapila <amit.kap...@huawei.com> wrote: > > On Sunday, June 30, 2013 11:37 AM Fabien COELHO wrote: > >> If we had a different set of tests, that would be a valid argument. But > >> we don't, so it's not. And nobody has offered to write a feature to > >> split our tests either. > > >I have done a POC. See: > > > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1170 > > I think it is better to submit for next commit fest which is at below link: > > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=19 > > Hi,
- There is a certain value in having separate tests, just that for the big-tests to be any meaningful, if the buildfarm could run on a periodic (daily?) basis and send some kind of automated bug-reports. Without an automatic feedback, most may not inclined to run all tests before submitting a patch and there'd be a big pile up near a release. - For now, the new tests that I submit for review (for next CF) would be for 'make check', until a 'make bigcheck' or whatever is up and running. -- Robins Tharakan
