On 07/01/2013 04:39 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 6/29/13 1:54 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I haven't seen a response to this. One thing we are missing is
documentation. Given that I'm inclined to commit all of this (i.e.
cedric's patches 1,2,3, and 4 plus my addition).
Could someone post an updated set of patches that is currently under
consideration?
See what I actually committed today.
I'm also inclined to backpatch it, since without that it seems to me
unlikely packagers will be able to make practical use of it for several
years, and the risk is very low.
Actually, the risk of makefile changes is pretty high, especially in
cases involving advanced features such as vpath. GNU make hasn't been
as stable is one might think, lately. We should carefully consider
exactly which parts are worth backpatching.
These changes are fairly small and mostly non-invasive, but if I've
broken something we should find out about it fairly quickly, I hope.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
