Sorry for joining the thread this late, but I didn't really expect to see myself listed as a slacker on a public list.
> Additionally, the following committers are not listed as reviewers on > any patch. Note that I have no way to search which ones might be > *committers* on a patch, so these folks are not necessarily slackers This means I'm a slacker because I'm not reviewing or committing a patch, right? Do we have a written rule somewhere? Or some other communication about this? I would have liked to know this requirement before getting singled out in public. Also I'd like to know who made the decision to require a patch review from each committer as I certainly missed it. Was the process public? Where can I find more about it? In general I find it difficult to digest that other people make decisions about my spare time without me having a word in the discussion. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org Jabber: michael.meskes at gmail dot com VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
