On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 03:34:06PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 07/03/2013 03:08 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > > You are way out of line. You have no right to expect ANYONE to > > participate in patch review and commit. Michael is doing us a favor > > by maintaining ECPG even though he's not heavily involved in the > > project any more and has other things to do with his time. > > That's a good point. I hadn't considered (or realized the extent of) > the occasional and specific nature of Michael's involvement with the > project these days. My apologies, then, Michael. > > Is there anyone else on the committer list with similar circumstances?
You know what this reminds me of --- early communist movements. Members were scrutinized to see if they were working hard enough for "the cause", and criticized/shamed/punished if they were not. The leaders became tyrants, and justified the tyranny because they were creating "a better society". We all know that didn't end well. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
