On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 7/5/13 2:50 AM, Jeff Davis wrote: >> >> So, my simple conclusion is that glibc emulation should be about the >> same as what we're doing now, so there's no reason to avoid it. That >> means, if posix_fallocate() is present, we should use it, because it's >> either the same (if emulated in glibc) or significantly faster (if >> implemented in the kernel). > > > That's what I'm seeing everywhere too. I'm happy that we've spent enough > time chasing after potential issues without finding anything now. Pull out > the GUC that was added for default and this is ready to commit.
Wonderful. Is removing the GUC something that I should do or should that be done by somebody that knows more about what they are doing? (I am happy to give it a go!) Should the small test program that I made also be included somewhere in the source tree? -- Jon -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
