On 07/16/2013 03:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes: >> On 07/09/2013 01:10 AM, Fabien COELHO wrote: >>>> Where are we with this patch? Fabien, are you going to submit an >>>> updated version which addresses the objections, or should I mark it >>>> Returned With Feedback? > >>> There is no need for an updated patch. I addressed the objections with >>> words, not code:-) > >> So, Tom, Robert, Cedric: can we have a verdict? Commit or no? > > My vote is still no, because of (1) the keyword-creep issue, and > (2) the fact that this is proposing to invent non-standard syntax > for functionality that's in the SQL standard.
Ok, marking "Returned with Feedback". -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
