Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> writes:
> (I don't know whether VARIADIC transition functions work today, but that would
> become an orthogonal project.)
Coincidentally enough, some Salesforce folk were asking me about allowing
VARIADIC aggregates just a few days ago. I experimented enough to find
out that if you make an array-accepting transition function, and then
force the aggregate's pg_proc entry to look like it's variadic (by
manually setting provariadic and some other fields), then everything
seems to Just Work: the parser and executor are both fine with it.
So I think all that's needed here is to add some syntax support to
CREATE AGGREGATE, and probably make some tweaks in pg_dump. I was
planning to go work on that sometime soon.
Having said that, though, what Andrew seemed to want was VARIADIC ANY,
which is a *completely* different kettle of fish, since the actual
parameters can't be converted to an array. I'm not sure if that's
as easy to support.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
