Hello, I'm very sory to take your time on this mess. ul 2013 16:06:11 +0530, Amit Kapila <amit.kap...@huawei.com> wrote in <014201ce7bc6$f71eb950$e55c2bf0$@kap...@huawei.com> > I understood your patch's algorithm, but still I have doubt in my mind that > if the next analyze can correct the estimates, > Why would that be not sufficient. Please refer my last mail for analysis of > same > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/000601ce77ad$7d3388e0$779a9aa0$@kapila@ > huawei.com
Hmm. I've reconfirmed what was happened on my test set. As the result, the misestimation with dead_tup = 0 which I thought to observe has turned out to be an illusion.. Tuple number estimation is working as it is expected. I withdraw this patch. regards, -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
