* Greg Stark (st...@mit.edu) wrote: > So given that WITH ORDINALITY is really only useful for UNNEST and we > can generalize it to all SRFs on the basis that Postgres SRFs do > produce ordered sets not unordered relations it isn't crazy for the > work to be in the Function node.
I agree, it isn't *crazy*. :)
> Now that I've written that though it occurs to me to wonder whether
> FDW tables might be usefully said to be ordered too though?
My thought around this was a VALUES() construct, but FDWs are an
interesting case to consider also; with FDWs it's possible that
something is said in SQL/MED regarding this question- perhaps it would
make sense to look there?
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
