* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes: > > However, I comment on this mainly because anchovy has had issues with > > 9.1 and older for some time, which looks like an issue with GCC 4.8.0. > > Did you happen to resolve or identify what is happening there..? > > Yeah, we know about that: > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/14242.1365200...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ah, right, read the thread but didn't attach it to anchovy.
> The bottom line was:
> >> It looks like our choices are (1) teach configure to enable
> >> -fno-aggressive-loop-optimizations if the compiler recognizes it,
> >> or (2) back-port commit 8137f2c32322c624e0431fac1621e8e9315202f9.
>
> I am in favor of fixing the back branches via (1), because it's less
> work and much less likely to break third-party extensions. Some other
> people argued for (2), but I've not seen any patch emerge from them,
> and you can bet I'm not going to do it.
Yea, just passing -fno-aggressive-loop-optimizations seems like the
safest and best option to me also..
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
