* Bruce Momjian (br...@momjian.us) wrote: > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 11:16:24AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > > I don't think this is a small thing. I really think we'll get a LOT of > > blowback from sysadmins -- and maybe even refusals to upgrade -- if we > ---------------------------------- > > Really? Is that a reasonable statement?
I don't believe Josh was saying that in jest.. I certainly believe that
it could happen.
> > As I've said before, I think the disable switch can be a follow-up patch
> > to the main ALTER SYSTEM SET patch.
Even if it's a different patch, it should go in at the same time, imv..
> You are mixing the behaviors of disabling the ALTER SYSTEM SET command
> with recognizing ALTER SYSTEM SET settings already made --- the later
> would be to fix a problem with the server not starting.
That's a good point.
> However,
> frankly, these are flat files, so I don't see a problem with having the
> administrator modify the flat file.
Admins on Ubuntu or Debian or a host of their derivatives aren't going
to be looking in $PGDATA for config files that they have to hand-modify
to fix something the DBA did. When they eventually figure it out,
they're going to be *very* unhappy.
> Would disabling the ALTER SYSTEM SET command also disable recognizing
> any ALTER SYSTEM SET commands already performed? Maybe that was already
> understood, but I missed that point.
I don't have an answer to that one, though I do like the idea of a
switch that says "only read the settings from my postgresql.conf file".
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
