On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On 2013-08-06 03:24:58 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> We discussed the $SUBJECT in the following threads: >> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ca+tgmozbr+wl8e7mf_krp6fy4fd2pmr11tpiuyjmfx_vtg1...@mail.gmail.com >> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHGQGwEBUvgcx8X+Z0Hh+VdwYcJ8KCuRuLt1jSsxeLxPcX=0...@mail.gmail.com >> >> Our consensus seems to remove "not fast" promotion at all >> because there is no use case for that promotion. >> >> Attached patch removes "not fast" promotion. Barring any objections, >> I will commit this patch. > > FWIW I'd rather keep plain promotion for a release or two. TBH, I have a > bit of trust issues regarding the new method, and I'd like to be able to > test potential issues against a stock postgres by doing a normal instead > of a fast promotion.
So we should add new option specifying the promotion mode, into pg_ctl? Currently pg_ctl cannot trigger the normal promotion. Or, instead of normal promotion, it might be better to use another promotion technique like shutdown + remove recovery.conf + restart for that purpose? Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
