On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 10:57:56AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> writes: > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 06:59:13PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Does that ameliorate your concern, or do you still want it to be DEBUG1? > > > I think of the "implicit sequence" messages we moved from NOTICE to DEBUG1 > > somewhat recently. No doubt those messages had helped at times, but they > > didn't quite carry their weight at NOTICE. My gut prediction is that this > > will fall in that same utility range. But you make a valid point about > > noise > > in the startup log being easier to discount. > > Well, we can certainly back off the messages' log level if we get > complaints. But I think the argument for this patch being useful > is a great deal stronger if it's allowed to operate by default.
True enough. Your plan makes sense to me now; thanks. -- Noah Misch EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
