Robert Haas escribió: > On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > > A shared catalog which defined which *database* to run the trigger in, > > with a way to fire off a new backend worker in that database and tell it > > to run the trigger, might be interesting and would deal with the issue > > that the trigger would behave differently depending on the database > > connected to. That would bring along other issues, of course, but it > > seemed an interesting enough idea to mention. > > Eh, maybe. I'm not sure there's enough use case for that to justify > the amount of infrastructure it would require. I'm happy with the > recent enhancements to background workers, but there's an awful lot of > ground to cover between that and what you're proposing.
Yeah, agreed. There's a lot of infrastructure required for this; it seems hard to justify it only to support disabling ALTER SYSTEM. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
