Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > Yeah, I've been thinking about this a bit also and agree that 9.3 > is fine but not farther back.
+1 to 9.3 but no farther back. I would be in favor of going farther back if there were not fairly obvious workarounds for the OOM problems that lack of back-patch could cause. -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
