On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 19:21 +0300, Tarvi Pillessaar wrote: > About patch: > Patch is tested against 9.2.4. > I was not sure that i should check if the lock holder's proclock was > found (as lock holder's proclock should be always there), check is there > to be on the safe side, but maybe it's unnecessary. > If it's not needed then fallback to old behavior (logging without > detail) is not needed as well. > And yes, i know that the lock holding time is not actually correct and > it actually shows milliseconds since transaction start. >
Please fix this compiler warning: proc.c: In function ‘ProcSleep’: proc.c:1258:6: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Wdeclaration-after-statement] -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
