Hi,
On 2013-08-26 10:10:54 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> I think we've gotten a bit off the track of the proposed patch, which is
> designed to report the system_identifier string currently in
> pg_controldata, nothing more.
Agreed.
> I'm going to reverse my vote, and vote against this patch. The reason
> why is that I think we should instead have a function:
>
> pg_controldata(parameter text)
>
> ... which would report *all* strings in pg_controldata. Hence, you'd do
> instead:
>
> pg_controldata('system identifier')
>
> This will hopefully spare us from 15 patches incrementally adding all of
> the individual items in controldata.
If anything but the proposed feature, it should be an SRF - passing in
text parameters isn't very discoverable. And I can't imagine where an
SRF would have too high overhead.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
