Tom Lane wrote: > What exactly is the argument for pushing this into 9.3? Since we > are past rc1, we should treat that branch as released. If you wouldn't > back-patch into all supported branches, you shouldn't be patching 9.3 > either.
This is to fix the stats_temp_directory issue that the directory is too public. We had agreed that it wasn't a problem before 9.3, but it is in that branch because we changed the code to write so many files now instead of just one. If there's agreement to tighten the permission check in HEAD only, then I will only commit to that branch. But it seems a bit odd to me postpone the tightening. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
