On 2013-08-28 14:04:59 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > >> + <function>RegisterDynamicBackgroundWorker(<type>BackgroundWorker > >> + *worker, BackgroundWorkerHandle **handle</type>)</function>. Unlike > >> + <function>RegisterBackgroundWorker</>, which can only be called from > >> within > >> + the postmaster, <function>RegisterDynamicBackgroundWorker</function> > >> must be > >> + called from a regular backend. > >> </para> > > > > s/which can only be called from within the posmaster/during initial > > startup, via shared_preload_libraries/? > > This seems like a possible doc clarification not intimately related to > the patch at hand. The only reason that paragraph is getting reflowed > is because of the additional argument to > RegisterDynamicBackgroundWorker(). On the substance, I could go > either way on whether your proposed text is better than what's there > now.
I agree it's unrelated. I just noticed because it was in the diff ;) > It seems like it might need a bit of wordsmithing, anyway. Yes, looks like it could use some. It's not going to be me doing it tho... Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
