Jan Wieck writes:

> I think we will have no chance to really return the number of
> VIEW-tuples affected. So any implementation is only a guess and we could
> simply return fixed 42 if "some" tuples where affected at all. This
> return is as wrong (according to Steve) as everything else but at least
> we have a clear definition what it means.

Maybe we should return something to the effect of "unknown, but something
happened".  I can see that returning 0 in case of doubt might confuse
applications.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Reply via email to