(2013/09/04 2:34), Josh Berkus wrote: > >>>> I've checked the PostgreSQL License, >>>> and had a question. >>>> http://opensource.org/licenses/PostgreSQL >> >> I don't know who opensource.org are, but their idea of "the PostgreSQL >> license" doesn't appear to match the actual license text. > > The OSI, which is the organization which defines whether licenses are > open source or not. We requested that they list The PostgreSQL License > on their site after Red Hat determined that our license had sufficent > textual differences from the BSD License to be a different license. > > I've requested that the spurious "file name" reference be removed. > Thank you for checking it soon.
I understands that "the PostgreSQL license" does not require any specified file name and missing "LICENSE" is not problem. I'm Sorry for the stupid question. regards, ------------ Tomonari Katsumata -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
