On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Let me be clear that I'm not against the concept of custom plan nodes. > But it was obvious from the beginning that making the executor deal with > them would be much easier than making the planner deal with them. I don't > think we should commit a bunch of executor-side infrastructure in the > absence of any (ahem) plan for doing something realistic on the planner > side. Either that infrastructure will go unused, or we'll be facing a > continual stream of demands for doubtless-half-baked planner changes > so that people can do something with it. > > I'd be willing to put in the infrastructure as soon as it's clear that we > have a way forward, but not if it's never going to be more than a kluge.
Fair enough, I think. So the action item for KaiGai is to think of how the planner integration might work. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
