Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 2013-09-10 12:31:22 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> I've been thinking of late that it might be time to retire libpq's >>> support for V2 protocol (other than in the specific context of the first >>> error message received while trying to make a connection).
>> It's probably worth polling for that. I believe the jdbc driver at >> least has code for it, but I don't know if it's a requirement at this >> point. > Yes, it has code for it and I think it's still used pretty frequently to > circumvent prepared statement planning problems (misestimation, > indeterminate types). So I think we need convincing reasons to break > their usage. Note that I was proposing removing libpq's support for V2 connections. Not the backend's. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers