Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm awfully sorry that I missed this thread. But I do not really > understand the problem. If we cannot be exactly as specified why aren't > we coming close? As it stands now I have to implement my own > PREPARE/EXECUTE in ecpg and the syntax does clash with the backend one.
But you must implement your own PREPARE/EXECUTE anyway, using ecpg variables, no? If you can really embed what you need in the backend facility, and only the syntax variation is getting in the way, then maybe I misunderstand the problem. How do parameters of PREPAREd statements work in ecpg? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]