On 2013-09-13 15:03:31 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Andres Freund (and...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > > It seems slightly cleaner to just move the pqsecure_destroy(); to the > > end of that function, based on a boolean. But if you think otherwise, I > > won't protest... > > Hmm, agreed; I had originally been concerned that the SIGPIPE madness > needed to be around the pqsecure_destroy() call, but I can't see why > that would be. > > I've run through a few times w/ the attached and haven't seen the > deadlock. Will continue testing, of course.
That patch looks wrong to me. Note that the if (conn->ssl) branch resets conn->ssl to NULL. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
