On 2013-09-19 18:23:07 +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: > I've been told at several instances that this has been made for the JVM > and other such programs that want to allocate huge amount of memory even > if they don't really intend to use it.
That's not really related - what you describe is memory overcommitting (which as lots of uses besides JVMs). That's not removed by the changes references upthread. What has changed is how to react to situations where memory has been overcommitted but is now actually needed. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
